novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10

#Novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10 drivers#
#Novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10 upgrade#
#Novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10 software#

Make your case by producing a plan to roll out these changes in phases over the next year, depending your organizations size.

If these machines are within three to five years old but without at least 8gb or RAM and SSDs, personally, I would make that my argument, as having these simple upgrades will drastically improve productivity.

#Novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10 upgrade#

Then and only then will you be able to prove that it is time for a upgrade on PC hardware but you might only get approval for those machines having issues, which is still a win. At this point I would see it as a pointless argument until you can pull up a record of service calls to multiple or single machines having issues. You have not provided any detail regarding your situation and what the problem actually is. You will have to make your case, there is no right or wrong answer here. What would numbers on paper show a CFO? Nothing because they wouldn't understand it. The CFO is doing what he supposed to do and is questioning your budget submission and will not easily give way without strong evidence. So to push back at the CFO, produce a more detailed set of arguments rather than a blanket replace a third a year. You could also ask for a budget to replace some of the older machines because of the technical need to run more demanding programmes.

#Novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10 software#

In other words, I think that your quest for stress testing software is doomed to failure and you need to argue from a different angle.Īnd as others have suggested you could argue for a budget to upgrade machines and to replace items that get worn out such as hard drives and you could argue for a budget to hardware service the machines by cleaning filters out.

You say, 'takes more and more work to maintain to a usable level' then you need the techs to provide logs and evidence of their assertion for your argument to the CFO. It maybe that you need the support of manufactures such as Dell and they do not support them after so many years which could be part of the argument. It is not so much proving your stock is worn out as showing that users have a productivity problem if they carry on using the old items. I have old machines that just go on and on and do all that is asked of them and think it would be stupid to replace them every 4 years when they still work well. Your CFO is right to question your practice of replacing a 1/3 or 1/4 of the company computers each year. We will faze them out this and next year and after that there will probably be a plan to change hardware every 8 years. There is a little bit of CPU difference to the new stations, but not for what they are used (Thunderbird and medico app). They are Core2Duo, and half of them are upgraded to 4GB ram and SSD and they rock Win10 just fine. We still have probably arround a good two hundred of Lenovo M57 that are cca 12yo and we're fazing them out last three years.

#Novabench score for i7 3.4 ghz windows 10 drivers#

Hardware this days is stable, drivers are stable, and there is no real difference in consumption from old and new for low power user. So, once you have enough RAM for your work and use an SSD, there is no real point to change your hardware. We refreshed quite a large proportion of our machines in last three years, but in reality we still have machines that were in production 10 years ago and for what they are used, their hardware is enough (keep in mind we expanded memory and installed SSD). Do you need your machines to be in waranty due to licensing, certification, etc, get new one, if now, why would you.Do you need new hardware to be certified for the software you use, then get new one, if not, why would you spend money.Do you need a better machine specification for your work, then get a new machine, but if you can do your work with the existing one, why would you get a new one?.